Re: Erotyka zachętą do ochrony zwierząt?
A także komentarz Carol J. Adams ze strony supervegan.com:
While many things could be said--that this image is misogynistic, that this image is an anti-homage to The Sexual Politics of Meat, a sort of "f you" to all feminist-vegans who have been saying, for gee, almost 40 years, that meat eating arises from and exists with a patriarchal world and we can't end meat eating if we don't challenge the patriarchal world view, here is a different, vegan-based response, a vegan challenge to a vegan organization: what vegan do you know thinks of animals like this, a living animal divided into parts of (future) meat? PETA, if your goal is to create a vegan world, why sexualize body parts and make them enticing? Why not either tell the truth (body parts are muscle and bone, bleeding) or show the animal her or himself and let the animal represent her need to be seen as individual, not as fragmented body parts? I don't expect anything feminist to arise from PETA institutionally (the proclamations from women like Ingrid to the contrary that they are women and thus they are feminist). But shouldn't we as vegans, expect PETA to represent a vegan consciousness?
Komentarz PETA i całość wpisu na tej stronie.